nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cogent & Google IPv6


From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:26:36 -0600 (CST)

Isn't that how "Tier 1s" have always operated? Like, always? Customers or peers with peers subject to various 
requirements. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam () gmail com> 
To: "Matt Hoppes" <mhoppes () indigowireless com> 
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog () nanog org> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 2:18:24 PM 
Subject: Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 

On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:46:56 -0500, Matt Hoppes 
<mhoppes () indigowireless com> wrote: 
Isn't that how the Internet is suppose to work? 

Perhaps. But that's not how *Cogent* works. They have a very idiotic view 
of "Tier 1". They have no transit connections with anyone; someone is 
paying them for every prefix they accept. 

Translation: No one in their right mind does business with Cogent. 


Current thread: