nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue
From: Todd Underwood <toddunder () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:35:38 -0500
Can you scope "issue" with any facts or data? T On Feb 17, 2016 11:16, "Fred Hollis" <fred () web2objects com> wrote:
Anyone else aware of it?
Current thread:
- Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Fred Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Todd Underwood (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Niels Bakker (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Nick Hilliard (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue jim deleskie (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Todd Underwood (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Christopher Morrow (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Todd Underwood (Feb 17)
- RE: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Damien Burke (Feb 17)
- Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Fred Hollis (Feb 17)
- RE: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue Damien Burke (Feb 17)