Re: [Tier1 ISP]: Vulnerable to a new DDoS amplification attack

["Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>]

I admit that I have a lot of guts.

Not sure who said that I am a booter or that I operate a booter. I fight 
booter since more than 5 years and who would be stupid enough to put his 
full name with full address to a respected network operators list? 
Definitely not me.

I want to help and fix things and I am not the kind of person to break 
things.


Jean

On 16-12-22 03:46 AM, j.j.santanna () utwente nl wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> You are either naive or have a lot of guts to offer a Booter service in one of the most respected network operators list. Man, as 
> long as you use amplifiers (third party services) or botnets your “service” is illegal & immoral.  In case you use your own 
> infrastructure or rent a legal (cloud) infrastructure to provide your "service" it will not pay your costs. Not at least by 
> the price that you offer your service: 0,  13, 100 bucks. Even if you have a legal/moral acceptable attack infrastructure, if you 
> throw those big attacks that you advertise will possibly take down many others third-parties on the way.
>
> Sometimes you folks say that (mis)use amplifiers for “testing” purpose is not a problem because those services are open 
> and publicly available on the Internet. Come on… if I leave my car open with the key inside it doesn’t give you the 
> right to use my car to throw into a third party company. And if you do, it is YOUR CRIME, not mine.
>
> I don’t need to explain why using botnets is illegal and immoral, right?
>
> Man, it is up to you decide between cyber crime and cyber security 
> (https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/public-awareness-and-prevention-guides/cyber-crime-vs-cyber-security-what-will-you-choose).
>  Now, we are also looking to you on http://booterblacklist.com<http://booterblacklist.com/>. Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jair Santanna
>
>
>
>
> On 22 Dec 2016, at 07:51, Alexander Lyamin <la () qrator net<mailto:la () qrator net>> wrote:
>
> I am just trying to grasp what is similarity between  networks on the list
> and why it doesn't include, say NTT or Cogent.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Jean | ddostest.me<http://ddostest.me/> via NANOG <
> nanog () nanog org<mailto:nanog () nanog org>> wrote:
>
> Hello all, I'm a first time poster here and hope to follow all rules.
>
> I found a new way to amplify traffic that would generate really high
> volume of traffic.+10Tbps
>
> ** There is no need for spoofing ** so any device in the world could
> initiate a really big attack or be part of an attack.
>
> We talk about an amplification factor x100+. This mean that a single
> computer with 1 Gbps outgoing bandwidth would generate a 100 Gbps DDoS.
> Imagine what a botnet could do?
>
> The list of affected business is huge and I would like to privately
> disclose the details to the Tier1 ISP as they are highly vulnerable.
>
> XO Comm
> PSINET
> Level 3
> Qwest
> Windstream Comm
> Eearthlink
> MCI Comm/Verizon Buss
> Comcast Cable Comm
> AT&T
> Sprint
>
> I know it's Christmas time and there is no rush in disclosing this but, it
> could be a nice opportunity to meditate and shed some lights on this new
> DDoS threat. We could start the real work in January.
>
>
> If you are curious and you operate/manage one of the network mentioned
> above, please write to me at tornaddos () ddostest me<mailto:tornaddos () ddostest me> from your job email to
> confirm the identity. I will then forward you the DDoS details.
>
> Best regards
>
> Jean St-Laurent
> ddostest.me<http://ddostest.me/>
> 365 boul. Sir-Wilfrid-Laurier #202
> Beloeil, QC J3G 4T2
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Alexander Lyamin
>
> CEO | Qrator <http://qrator.net/>* Labs*
>
> office: 8-800-3333-LAB (522)
>
> mob: +7-916-9086122
>
> skype: melanor9
>
> mailto:  la () qrator net<mailto:la () qrator net>