nanog mailing list archives
Re: Avalanche botnet takedown
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:47:16 -0500
[ Reposted with proper Subject line. My apologies. Insufficient coffee. ] On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:01:50PM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
As you probably know Rich, that's not exactly a novel observation. Vixie was already saying it a full six years ago, and things have only gotten worse since then.
Yep. I remember reading that. The only change I would make is that Paul wrote: Most new domain names are malicious. and I think a more accurate/updated/refined statement in 2016 would be: Almost all new domain names are malicious. We are busy trying to support a domain name system that is two to three orders of magnitude larger (as measured by domains) than it should be or needs to be. And nearly all of what we're supporting is malicious. ---rsk
Current thread:
- Re: Avalanche botnet takedown, (continued)
- Re: Avalanche botnet takedown Paul Ferguson (Dec 01)
- Re: Avalanche botnet takedown Tony Finch (Dec 02)
- Re: Avalanche botnet takedown Rich Kulawiec (Dec 01)
- Re: Avalanche botnet takedown J. Hellenthal (Dec 01)
- Re: Avalanche botnet takedown Justin Paine via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: Avalanche botnet takedown Robert McKay (Dec 01)
- Re: Avalanche botnet takedown Rich Kulawiec (Dec 01)
- Re: [nanog] Re: Avalanche botnet takedown Hugo Salgado-Hernández (Dec 02)
- Re: [nanog] Avalanche botnet takedown Jason Hellenthal (Dec 02)
- Re: Avalanche botnet takedown J. Hellenthal (Dec 01)
- Re: Avalanche botnet takedown Ronald F. Guilmette (Dec 01)
- Re: Avalanche botnet takedown Rich Kulawiec (Dec 02)
- RE: Avalanche botnet takedown Steve Mikulasik (Dec 01)
- Re: Avalanche botnet takedown Ronald F. Guilmette (Dec 01)
- Re: Avalanche botnet takedown Ronald F. Guilmette (Dec 09)