nanog mailing list archives

Re: Not a representative of gmx.com but their emails are being blocked by those who subscribe to the SORBS RBL.


From: David Hofstee <david () mailplus nl>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:02:23 +0100 (CET)

Sorbs is a pretty good list. And I've been on the listed-side too. I personally would not use it to block, but I would 
give it 3 of the 5 points.

The anti-spam gang is never going to be perfect. But since (self)regulation is not working, we need them. I value them 
at the moment. The only thing you can do about it, is figuring a way to solve this security issue (called spam). 

Met vriendelijke groet,


David Hofstee

Deliverability Management
MailPlus B.V. Netherlands (ESP)

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: "Tom Beecher" <beecher () beecher cc>
Aan: "Ken O'Driscoll" <ken () wemonitoremail com>, nanog () nanog org
Verzonden: Zondag 18 december 2016 20:08:05
Onderwerp: Re: Not a representative of gmx.com but their emails are being blocked by those who subscribe to the SORBS 
RBL.

I tend to scratch my head at anyone still using SORBS at this point.


On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 8:27 AM Ken O'Driscoll <ken () wemonitoremail com>
wrote:

On Sat, 2016-12-17 at 20:15 -0800, Large Hadron Collider wrote:

Does anyone have information on why this is, and if you represent SORBS

and/or GMX and/or both, would you please trouble yourself with

contacting me off-list?



You can find out why an IP was listed via their lookup facility:

http://www.

sorbs.net/lookup.shtml



You can request de-listing by opening a support request:

http://www.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/support



You don't need to be an IP block owner to request de-listing but you do
need to be empowered to stop whatever caused the listing in the first
place. Their support is very responsive.



Ken.



--

Ken O'Driscoll / We Monitor Email

t: +353 1 254 9400 | w: www.wemonitoremail.com






Current thread: