nanog mailing list archives

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems


From: "Mike O'Connor" <mjo () dojo mi org>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:45:11 -0500

:On 05-12-2016 16:34, Nick Ryce wrote:
:> For testing downloads, fast.com is pretty nice
:> 
:
:The problem with fast.com is that they use HTTPS for the test. The user needs
:a fast computer to decode the SSL at full speed. Even if you have a very fast
:computer the test will max out at 100-200 Mbps because the Netflix servers
:are apparently not able to encode SSL any faster. Maybe we would get better
:speed if multiple SSL connections were used.

I've run into the opposite problem -- fast.com sporadically reporting
1+ Gbps times for circuits that are only 20-40 Mbps.  There's no obvious
client-side issues -- no proxying, interesting browsers, etc.  fast.com
is glitchy just often enough to give some friends of mine silly glee
when it misreports.

-Mike

--
 Michael J. O'Connor                                          mjo () dojo mi org
 =--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--=
"A superhero should always speak from his diaphragm!"               -The Tick

Attachment: signature.asc
Description:


Current thread: