nanog mailing list archives
Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 23:07:42 -0400
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke () gmail com> wrote:
But but but... cloud! THE CLOUD! Cloudy clouds fluffy white flying through the air, you should move everything to the Cloud (tm). Sometimes people forget that *somebody* needs to run the bare metal and OSI layer 1 things that physically make up the cloud.
mr by isn't wrong there are lots of ... over sold things. but, NFV isn't necessarily 'cloud'... It CAN BE taking purpose built appliance garbage that can't scale in a cost effective manner and replacing it with some software solution on 'many' commodity unix-like-hosts that can scale horizontally. -chris (just a chemical engineer... really)
Current thread:
- NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Kasper Adel (Aug 02)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Ca By (Aug 02)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Eric Kuhnke (Aug 02)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Christopher Morrow (Aug 02)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Randy Bush (Aug 03)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Ca By (Aug 03)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Christopher Morrow (Aug 03)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology jim deleskie (Aug 03)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Mark Tinka (Aug 03)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Hugo Slabbert (Aug 04)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Eric Kuhnke (Aug 02)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Ca By (Aug 02)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 02)