nanog mailing list archives

Re: udp 500 packets when users are web browsing


From: "Robert Webb" <rwebb () ropeguru com>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:25:52 -0400

Yes, we are looking at this now.

Thanks for everyone's help. I think we are heading in the right direction tracking this down. This just showed up in our monitoring and makes sense as we just brought up a new locked down domain.

Robert


On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:19:53 -0400
 "Oliver O'Boyle" <oliver.oboyle () gmail com> wrote:
You can configure Windows to encrypt traffic based on protocol definitions. E.g., Use IPSEC to encrypt all traffic on port 80 between hosts X and hosts
Y.

It's possible that such a policy is in place locally on the workstations and/or servers and it's also possible that it's being enforced using GPOs.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Robert Webb <rwebb () ropeguru com> wrote:

There is no VPN in the picture here. These are straight workstations on
the network that the packets are coming from.

According to a pcaket capture in wireshark, these are isakmp packets
reaching out to host names of web sites that are being browsed. So
destinations are sites like twitter, facebook, amazon, cnn, etc..

We have further discovered that they seem to be initiated from the Windows 7 svchost, but we have not been able to find documentation as to how or why
this is ocurring.

Robert


On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 13:42:21 +0000
 "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists () lists zabbadoz net> wrote:


On 03 Sep 2015, at 13:35 , Robert Webb <rwebb () ropeguru com> wrote:

We are seeing udp 500 packets being dropped at our firewall from user's browsing sessions. These are users on a 2008 R2 AD setup with Windows 7.

Source and destination ports are udp 500 and the the pattern of drops directly correlate to the web browsing activity. We have confirmed this with tcpdump of port 500 and a single host and watching the pattern of traffic as they browse. This also occurs no matter what browser is used.

Can anyone shine some light on what may be using udp 500 when web
browsing?


The VPN using IPsec UDP-Encap connection that supposedly gets through NAT? Have you checked the content with tcpdump? Do you have fragments
by any chance?


--
:o@>



Current thread: