nanog mailing list archives
Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115
From: "Paul S." <contact () winterei se>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:54:49 +0900
+1, this is the only sensible advice here. NSPs actually do seem to care about not letting things like these happen. On 2015/09/29 01:24 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
At 23:11 28/09/2015 -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:Start announcing their prefixes?Contact the upstreams of AS20115 - Cogent, Level3, HE and XO. -HankJosh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sep 28, 2015 11:09 PM, "Seth Mattinen" <sethm () rollernet us> wrote: > On 9/28/15 18:30, William Herrin wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us> >> wrote: >>>>> I've got a problem where AS20115 continues to announce prefixes after BGP >>> neighbors were shutdown. They claim it's a wedged BGP process but aren't>>> in >>> any hurry to fix it outside of a maintenance window. >>> >> >> If they weren't lying to you, they'd fix it now. That's not the kind >> of problem that waits. >>>> Thing is: they lied to you. Long ago they "helpfully" programmed their>> router to announce your route regardless of whether you sent a route >> to them. They want to wait for a maintenance window to remove that >> configuration. >> >>>> I'm at a loss of what else I can do. They admit the problem but won't take >>> action saying it needs to wait for a maintenance window. Am I out of line >>> insisting that's an unacceptable response to a problem that results in>>> prefix/traffic hijacking? >>> >>>> Try dropping the link entirely. If they still announce your addresses,>> bring it back up but report it as emergency down, escalate, and call>> back every 10 minutes until the junior tech understands that it's time>> to call and wake up the guy who makes the decision to fix it now. >> >> >> I'm at the tail end here almost 8 hours later since the hijacking started.> Their NOC is just blowing me off now and they're happy to continue the> hijacking until it's convenient for them to have a maintenance window. And> that's apparently the final decision. > > ~Seth >
Current thread:
- Re: Do you have INOC-DBA set up? (was: Re: PCH.net questions and thoughts - Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115), (continued)
- Re: Do you have INOC-DBA set up? (was: Re: PCH.net questions and thoughts - Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115) Niels Bakker (Sep 29)
- Re: Do you have INOC-DBA set up? (was: Re: PCH.net questions and thoughts - Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115) Bob Evans (Sep 29)
- Re: Do you have INOC-DBA set up? (was: Re: PCH.net questions and thoughts - Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115) Matthew Walster (Sep 29)
- Re: Do you have INOC-DBA set up? (was: Re: PCH.net questions and thoughts - Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115) Pete Mundy (Sep 29)
- Re: PCH.net questions and thoughts - Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115 Royce Williams (Sep 29)
- Re: PCH.net questions and thoughts - Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115 Jay Ashworth (Sep 29)
- Re: PCH.net questions and thoughts - Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115 Aaron (Sep 29)
- Re: PCH.net questions and thoughts - Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115 John Todd (Sep 29)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115 goemon (Sep 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115 Hank Nussbacher (Sep 28)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115 Paul S. (Sep 28)
- RE: Prefix hijacking by AS20115 Jürgen Jaritsch (Sep 28)