Re: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector

[Rod Beck <Rod.Beck () hibernianetworks com>]

Roland is correct. With the caveat that your Internet customer traffic may flow over the fibers as your separate 
management circuits. You should aim for end to end physical diversity. This is all common sense, but laziness some 
times takes precedence.



Roderick Beck
Sales - Europe and the Americas
Hibernia Networks
http://www.hibernianetworks.com
Budapest and New York
36-30-859-5144
rod.beck () hibernianetworks com

________________________________________
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2015 5:43 PM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector

On 1 Sep 2015, at 22:39, Mark Tinka wrote:

> Have been doing so for years, no major drama.

Until there is.

;>

-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
This e-mail and any attachments thereto is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may be 
proprietary and/or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, without the prior written 
permission of the sender is strictly prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately telephone or 
e-mail the sender and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of this e-mail, and any printout thereof. All 
documents, contracts or agreements referred or attached to this e-mail are SUBJECT TO CONTRACT. The contents of an 
attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses that could damage your own computer system. While Hibernia 
Networks has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, we cannot accept liability for any damage that 
you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.