Re: Synful Knock questions...

[Blake Hudson <blake () ispn net>]

I always perform the md5 and/or SHA verification of images on flash 
against the Cisco website. This is mainly to ensure a good transfer from 
TFTP. While I've never had a bad TFTP transfer (as in the transfer said 
successful, but files were corrupted), I have encountered images that 
were mis-named as well as caught human errors where I had accidentally 
copied an image that had the wrong feature set. The verification helps 
prevent these oversights.

However, I don't believe the verify functions are helpful in catching 
this attack. Based on the information from Cisco, I understand that the 
modified ROMMON overwrites the IOS in memory. Thus the file on flash 
will not be modified and will appear normal. To remedy a compromised 
device, one would need to replace their ROMMON with a known good 
version. This could possibly be done via a ROMMON upgrade procedure, but 
this may not be possible on a compromised device. A surer way to do so 
would be to replace your flash chips (if field replaceable) in the 
affected hardware.

--Blake


Stephen Satchell wrote on 9/15/2015 3:46 PM:
> On 09/15/2015 11:40 AM, Jake Mertel wrote:
> > C) keep the
> > image firmware file size the same, preventing easy detection of the
> > compromise.
>
> Hmmm...time to automate the downloading and checksumming of the IOS 
> images in my router.  Hey, Expect, I'm looking at YOU.
>
> Wait a minute...doesn't Cisco have checksums in its file system? This 
> might be even easier than I thought, no TFTP server required...
>
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/security/intelligence/iosimage.html#10
>
>    Switch#dir *.bin
>
>    (Capture the image name)
>
>    Switch#verify /md5 my.installed.IOS.image.bin
>
> The output is a bunch of dots (for a switch) followed by an output 
> line that ends "= xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" with the 
> x's replaced with the MD5 hash.
>
> The command is on 2811 routers, too.  Maybe far more devices, but I 
> didn't want to take the time to check.  You would need to capture the 
> MD5 from a known good image, and watch for changes.