nanog mailing list archives
Re: DDoS appliances reviews needed
From: Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 15:49:45 +0300
And at the end of the day it's commercial, vendors pay, I don't trust much. I am looking for hands-on experience.... Ramy
Message: 8 Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:00:10 +0000 From: Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik () civeo com> To: "nanog () nanog org" <nanog () nanog org> Subject: RE: DDoS appliances reviews needed Message-ID: < BY1PR0701MB1781D116ED99F67358E79877FA6F0 () BY1PR0701MB1781 namprd07 prod outlook comContent-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I assume they don't list their testing methodology right? It always feels like they just read vendor spec sheets. Steve Mikulasik -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Joe Chisolm Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:53 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: DDoS appliances reviews needed Gartner did a report about a year ago. Not free. https://www.gartner.com/doc/2910217/ddos-comparison-defense-approaches On 08/26/2015 07:40 AM, Ramy Hashish wrote:Good day all, Anybody here has experienced a PoC for any anti DDoS appliance, or already using a anti DDoS appliance in production and able to share his user experience/review? We need to collect good reviews from people whom got their hands dirty with the configuration/attack mitigation, real experience. Thanks, Ramy-- Joe Chisolm Computer Translations, Inc. Network and Datacenter Consulting Marble Falls, Tx. 830-265-8018 Public Key Available at http://www.sks-keyservers.net
Current thread:
- Re: DDoS appliances reviews needed Ramy Hashish (Sep 01)