nanog mailing list archives

Re: DDoS appliances reviews needed


From: Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 15:49:45 +0300

And at the end of the day it's commercial, vendors pay, I don't trust much.

I am looking for hands-on experience....

Ramy



Message: 8
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:00:10 +0000
From: Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik () civeo com>
To: "nanog () nanog org" <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: RE: DDoS appliances reviews needed
Message-ID:
        <
BY1PR0701MB1781D116ED99F67358E79877FA6F0 () BY1PR0701MB1781 namprd07 prod outlook com


Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I assume they don't list their testing methodology right? It always feels
like they just read vendor spec sheets.

Steve Mikulasik

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Joe Chisolm
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:53 AM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: DDoS appliances reviews needed

Gartner did a report about a year ago.  Not free.
https://www.gartner.com/doc/2910217/ddos-comparison-defense-approaches

On 08/26/2015 07:40 AM, Ramy Hashish wrote:
Good day all,

Anybody here has experienced a PoC for any anti DDoS appliance, or
already using a anti DDoS appliance in production and able to share
his user experience/review?

We need to collect good reviews from people whom got their hands dirty
with the configuration/attack mitigation, real experience.

Thanks,

Ramy


--
Joe Chisolm
Computer Translations, Inc.
Network and Datacenter Consulting
Marble Falls, Tx.
830-265-8018

Public Key Available at http://www.sks-keyservers.net






Current thread: