nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP-Echelon Compliance
From: "Bob Evans" <bob () FiberInternetCenter com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 08:30:39 -0700
WAIT WAIT - I know the solution to all of this. Let's pass a law that requires everyone to fill out a form to buy a device with a MAC address. Make them wait 10 days to verify the buyer has never committed a digital crime. While law enforcement puts it in a pile forms and pretends they can verify through the process of piling and ignoring it. 10 days later, If law enforcement doesn't call - the store can then call the buyer and tell them they can pick up their new potential crime committing internet device. Oh Gee, I see here that I have been living in California too long. Bob Evans CTO BTW, from this thread, I just learned that responding the way the spam email states doesn't make it possible communicate with company personnel - you must first fill out an application and register to communicate ? A kind or opt-in-proof. We get these emails.... 99% of the time its the same IP address subnets of wi-fi in hotels or schools. They are always 12 hours late and often older - days late - hotel guests customers have checked out or closed their hacked laptop after their lunch meeting. What's a busy hotel staff suppose to do track down a guest MAC addresses - hire better firewall companies to block specific port traffic because of its potential use? Thought that ol' bit-torrent stuff flips ports whenever it needs too ?
Hi Fred, I canât find your name, email address or the domain-name from your email in our mailboxes. If you send the request via this webform or via email to the address specified in the notice, weâll absolutely jump on it and respond ASAP. I canât monitor this thread further but please reach out via the channels described so we can help. Cheers, SethOn Oct 13, 2015, at 2:10 AM, Fred Hollis <fred () web2objects com> wrote: At least, we tried contacting you many times, but you ignored all our requests. Still receiving thousands of e-mails not related to our IPs on daily basis.On 13.10.2015 at 00:04 Seth Arnold wrote: Hi All, Please feel free to get in touch with us to request changes. Expedited processing of your requests is offered through the Notice Recipient Management for ISPs section of our website located here: http://www.ip-echelon.com/isp-notice-management/ <http://www.ip-echelon.com/isp-notice-management/> If you are in the U.S., please also ensure that your change is reflected in the records of the US Copyright Office: http://copyright.gov/onlinesp/list/a_agents.html <http://copyright.gov/onlinesp/list/a_agents.html> Cheers, Seth
Current thread:
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance, (continued)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Christopher Morrow (Oct 10)
- RE: IP-Echelon Compliance Matthew Black (Oct 09)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Fred Hollis (Oct 09)
- RE: IP-Echelon Compliance Seth Arnold (Oct 12)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Bjørn Mork (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Mike Hammett (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Baldur Norddahl (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Rich Kulawiec (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Bjørn Mork (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Fred Hollis (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance seth (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Bob Evans (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Peter Kristolaitis (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Jason Hellenthal (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Randy Bush (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Rich Kulawiec (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Stephen Satchell (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Randy Bush (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Christopher Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Matthias Leisi (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance George Herbert (Oct 14)