Re: IP-Echelon Compliance

[Theodore Baschak <theodore () ciscodude net>]

> On Oct 9, 2015, at 3:19 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:
>
> fairly certian that nothing ip-echelon sends is ever valid...
> or there's enough 'clearly you are joking' mail from them that anyone
> who ends up in court for 'ip echelon violations' could simply subpeona
> their isp for 'other complaints from ip echelon' and show the judge:
> "Clearly these folk are on the good crack, case closed due to
> reasonable doubt."

Are these the jokers that send out PGP signed antipiracy notices, but don't have that key available anywhere on the 
internet (keyserver, webpage, etc) to validate the authenticity of their signed messages?