Re: Satellites and submarine cables

[Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>]

Dyn Research, Doug Madory, has a good blog post looking at the physical 
threats affecting submarine cables; as well as covering recent historical
submarine cable outages due to human action.

http://research.dyn.com/2015/10/the-threat-of-telecom-sabotage/

And also a very nice infographic by Caroline Troein, Tufts University, 
show global submarine cable vulnerable points.

https://sites.tufts.edu/gis/files/2014/11/Troein_Caroline.pdf

Overall, Internet architecture has demonstrated resiliance to physical 
layer disruptions, but it has not proven as resliant to logical layer 
disruptions.


On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Sean Donelan wrote:

> Since the weekend's list problems seem to have died down.  How about some 
> infrastructure news.
>
>
> http://spacenews.com/from-russia-some-unofficial-assurance-about-lurking-luch-satellites-intent/
> > From Russia, Unofficial Assurance about Intent of Lurking Luch Satellite
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/26/world/europe/russian-presence-near-undersea-cables-concerns-us.html
> Russian Ships Near Data Cables Are Too Close for U.S. Comfort
>
>
> This seems to be a case of "I know you can see me, and I can see you."
>
> Its not new. Multiple countries have demostrated submarine and satellite 
> capabilities over the decades ... more submarines than satellites. But 
> generally everyone has more to lose than gain.  What is different is the 
> increasingly public rhetoric.
>
> Occasional satellites or submarine cable disruptions haven't had long term 
> impact on the US mainland due to US connectivity options. Carriers serving 
> the US mainland regularly have outages and repair submarine cable and 
> satellite problems. But countries with less connectivity options could get 
> pushed around more, along the lines of "Make him an offer he can't refuse." 
> Some of the public rhetoric may be for allies.