nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG list attack
From: Lamar Owen <lowen () pari edu>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:34:27 -0400
On 10/26/2015 03:17 PM, Larry Blunk wrote:
For what it's worth, while I did see all of these that made it through the list itself, the larger portion that I saw did not come through the list but were sent directly to me, and the Received header trail shows that those did not come through the nanog mailman. So I applaud what you do with the list itself, but it wouldn't have made (and won't make, in the future) much difference, since e-mails were sent out bypassing the list server.As Job Snijders (a fellow Communications Committee member) noted in an earlier post, we will be implementing some additional protection mechanisms to prevent this style of incident from happening again. We will be more aggressively moderating posts from addresses who have not posted recently, in addition to other filtering mechanisms.
And thanks for this note.
Current thread:
- NANOG list attack Larry Blunk (Oct 26)
- Re: NANOG list attack Job Snijders (Oct 26)
- Re: NANOG list attack Shrdlu (Oct 26)
- Re: NANOG list attack Mehmet Akcin (Oct 26)
- Re: NANOG list attack Mike (Oct 26)
- RE: NANOG list attack Brian R (Oct 26)
- Re: NANOG list attack Lamar Owen (Oct 29)
- Re: NANOG list attack Job Snijders (Oct 26)