nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internap route optimization
From: Rafael Possamai <rafaelpossa () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 09:12:09 -0600
A few years ago I had a couple boxes in a datacenter in Chicago that had its traffic optimized by Internap. Latency wise, it was always the lowest to my other applications, compared to other locations I had on-line. I am not sure what other benefits it brought aside from lower latency. One thing to remember is that they had several uplinks, so if you only have a couple I can't imagine the impact to be great. Just my 2cents. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Paras <paras () protrafsolutions com> wrote:
Does anyone know or have any experience with Internap's route optimization? Is it any good? I've heard of competing solutions as well, such as the one provided by Noction. Thanks for your input, Paras
Current thread:
- Internap route optimization Paras (Nov 05)
- Re: Internap route optimization Fred Hollis (Nov 05)
- Re: Internap route optimization Christopher Morrow (Nov 05)
- Re: Internap route optimization Fred Hollis (Nov 05)
- Re: Internap route optimization chip (Nov 05)
- Re: Internap route optimization Christopher Morrow (Nov 05)
- Re: Internap route optimization Mike Hammett (Nov 05)
- Re: Internap route optimization Sebastian Spies (Nov 05)
- Re: Internap route optimization Fred Hollis (Nov 05)
- Re: Internap route optimization Sebastian Spies (Nov 05)
- RE: Internap route optimization Eric Van Tol (Nov 05)
- Re: Internap route optimization Rafael Possamai (Nov 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Internap route optimization Brandon Wade via NANOG (Nov 05)
- Re: Internap route optimization Fred Hollis (Nov 05)