nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial?
From: Michael <excelsio () gmx com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 19:46:56 +0200
Well, we´re using 2x Cisco 3560X switches for simple inbound/outbound load sharing with our provider for years (http://wiki.nil.com/EBGP_load_sharing). There´s no need for us going full routes...
Regards, Michael
Current thread:
- BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? Maqbool Hashim (May 30)
- RE: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? Joseph Jackson (May 31)
- RE: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? Maqbool Hashim (May 31)
- Re: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? Faisal Imtiaz (May 31)
- Re: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? Mark Tinka (May 31)
- RE: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? Maqbool Hashim (May 31)
- Re: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? Faisal Imtiaz (May 31)
- RE: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? Maqbool Hashim (May 31)
- Re: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? Faisal Imtiaz (May 31)
- RE: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? Maqbool Hashim (May 31)
- RE: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? Maqbool Hashim (May 31)
- RE: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? Joseph Jackson (May 31)
- Re: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? William Herrin (May 31)
- Re: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? Michael (May 31)
- Re: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? Baldur Norddahl (May 31)
- Re: BGP Multihoming 2 providers full or partial? Jason Canady (May 31)