RE:

["Keith Medcalf" <kmedcalf () dessus com>]

Ah.  Security hole as designed.  inline dispositions should be ignored unless the recipient specifically "requests" to 
see them after viewing the text/plain part.  In fact, I would vote for ignoring *everything* except the text/plain part 
unless the recipient specifically requests it after viewing the text/plain part.  No test/plain?  Delete without 
further ado.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Mark Andrews
> Sent: Friday, 8 May, 2015 00:39
> To: Paul Ferguson
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject:
>
>
> In message <mailman.3786.1431050203.12477.nanog () nanog org>, Paul Ferguson
> via N
> ANOG writes:
> > Does anyone any else find it weird that the last dozen or so messages
> > from the list have been .eml attachments?
>
> Nanog is encapsulating messages that are DKIM signed.  Your mailer may
> not be properly handling
>
>       Content-Type: message/rfc822
>       Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Mark
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org