nanog mailing list archives
RE: optical gear cooling requirements
From: "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund () medline com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:37:58 +0000
I remember that there was an Ascend DSLAM built on the same chassis and it was collocated by someone into Ameritech central offices. Ameritech shut them all down saying that there was no way, no how that the device could be NEBS compliant. I don't know how that fight ever turned out, they were not ours. Side to side airflow is really bad news. Even with vertical you could at least mount some kind of baffles and lose a few Us. With side to side it is really hard to find a way to redirect air with the flanges in the way. Steven Naslund Chicago IL
Remember the Ascend MAX TNT and the sideways left-right airflow? ...
Current thread:
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements, (continued)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Martin Hannigan (Mar 03)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Chris Adams (Mar 03)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Ricky Beam (Mar 04)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Jay Hennigan (Mar 04)
- RE: optical gear cooling requirements Naslund, Steve (Mar 04)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Nick Hilliard (Mar 04)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Matthew Crocker (Mar 04)
- RE: optical gear cooling requirements Alex Rubenstein (Mar 05)
- RE: optical gear cooling requirements Vinny_Abello (Mar 05)
- RE: optical gear cooling requirements Vinny_Abello (Mar 05)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Martin Hannigan (Mar 03)
- RE: optical gear cooling requirements Naslund, Steve (Mar 04)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Colin Johnston (Mar 04)