nanog mailing list archives
RE: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
From: "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund () medline com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 17:45:17 +0000
::AWOOOOGAAAA:: Strawman Alert! Nobody's talking about taking poor Erlang behind the barn and shooting him. We're talking about being able to send upstream at a reasonable/comparable rate as downstream. Mike
Exactly, now you see the dilemma. What is reasonable/comparable? Is it reasonable to assume that users upload as much as they download when every traffic study I have ever done or seen tells me that is not the case? Is it reasonable for me to allocate my customers to 5M down/5M up when they really mostly use 8.5 down/1.5 up? I know it would make you happy to build my network so that you can twiddle the upload/download dials but is it reasonable to make all of my customers pay for that infrastructure rather than ask you to buy a more premium business class service if you want that? Steven Naslund Chicago IL
Current thread:
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality, (continued)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Aled Morris (Mar 02)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Mike Hammett (Mar 02)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Scott Helms (Mar 02)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Barry Shein (Mar 02)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Michael Thomas (Mar 02)
- RE: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Naslund, Steve (Mar 02)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Miles Fidelman (Mar 02)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Stephen Satchell (Mar 02)
- RE: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Naslund, Steve (Mar 02)
- Re: FW: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Miles Fidelman (Mar 02)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Kelly Setzer (Mar 10)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Owen DeLong (Mar 10)