nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 04:49:23 +0900
William Herrin wrote:
If you read what Joe wrote, he doesn't currently have an AS number or employ BGP with his Internet providers. Extrapolate for his IPv4 assignment situation and the /24 announcement barrier. In an IPv4-depleted world, he won't be doing anycast any time soon, even if it was a sound plan.
Anyone having /24 can start hosting business with 255*N anycast servers. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?, (continued)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? John Orthoefer (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Bill Woodcock (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? William Herrin (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? John Levine (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Bill Woodcock (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? William Herrin (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Bill Woodcock (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Mark Andrews (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? William Herrin (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? John Levine (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Masataka Ohta (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Owen DeLong (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Jon Lewis (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? James Hartig (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Abley (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Rob Seastrom (Jun 20)