nanog mailing list archives
Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 15:12:03 -0400
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at> wrote:
1) An all-IPv6 network inside, so the hosts can all talk to each other over IPv6 without using (potentially overlapping copies of) RFC1918 space...
this point keeps coming up... I don't see that 'overlapping ipv4' matters at all here. it is presented to the customer (vm oeprator) as 'a flat-ish lan' where you poke from machine to machine via names. (so it seems like a rathole/FUD-problem we can just stop talking about now) -chris
Current thread:
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture, (continued)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Luan Nguyen (Jun 01)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Matt Palmer (Jun 01)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Hugo Slabbert (Jun 01)
- RE: AWS Elastic IP architecture Tony Hain (Jun 01)
- Re: RE: AWS Elastic IP architecture Hugo Slabbert (Jun 01)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Christopher Morrow (Jun 01)
- RE: AWS Elastic IP architecture Tony Hain (Jun 01)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Christopher Morrow (Jun 01)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 03)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Ca By (Jun 01)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Christopher Morrow (Jun 01)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Matthew Kaufman (Jun 01)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Lee Howard (Jun 01)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Matt Palmer (Jun 01)
- Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture Owen DeLong (Jun 02)