nanog mailing list archives

Re: Route leak in Bangladesh


From: Job Snijders <job () instituut net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:49:10 +0200

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 04:38:48PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 30/Jun/15 16:24, Job Snijders wrote:
In this specific situation, for a small to medium sized network, it
might be prudent to apply an outbound prefix-filter on all transit &
peering sessions and thus only allowing prefixes which actually belong
to downstream customers and the network itself.

I say that regardless of size, deploy the ultimate solution as the
network is only bound to grow.

It's harder for folk to undo old habits as they become more
entrenched.

Nothing is ever regardless of anything :-)

I would forsee issues if i'd try to add an eleven megabyte prefix-list
on all devices in the network.

Kind regards,

Job


Current thread: