RE: Data Center Network Monitoring with TAPs

[Jason Sherron <jason.sherron () microsoft com>]

Some colleagues wrote up Microsoft DEMon:

https://sharkfest.wireshark.org/sharkfest.12/presentations/A-4_Leveraging_Openflow_to_create_a_Large_Scale_and_Cost_Effective_Packet_Capture_Network.pdf



-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Kristian Francisco
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 9:12 PM
To: Rafael Possamai <rafael () gav ufsc br>
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Data Center Network Monitoring with TAPs

I'm designing the first phase of a datacenter network monitoring project for my company. We are starting with SPAN at 
access layer and plan to control traffic volume using filtering, slicing, de-dupe, etc. There are instances when we 
need to do capacity/delay analysis on L2 traffic and Ixia, APCON, Emulex etc. are coming out with flow generators for 
SPAN/TAP traffic.

We may decide to go with TAP in the future as we found a vendor that was willing to implement functionality to allow us 
to offload flow generation from our access/distribution/core devices by creating templates based on the source 
device/interface. In essence, to our monitoring tools, netflow traffic will seem as if it is coming from the real 
device.

Best Regards,

Kristian J. Francisco

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Rafael Possamai <rafael () gav ufsc br> wrote:

> Here's a recent forum thread that discussed the same exact topic. You 
> might find some insight:
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/3aip3p/data_center_network
> _monitoring/
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Mitch Howards <hbf9121 () hotmail com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Was wondering what folks are using to monitor traffic  on their 
> > networks. Looking into Ixia and APCON devices for dedup and other 
> > filtering features as well as passive fiber TAPs to capture the 
> > traffic.
> >
> > How are folks handling TAP'ing large data center networks? TAPs at 
> > the "distribution layer" would be the best fit for my network but 
> > that would require a ton of passive fiber TAPs for the incoming 
> > fibers to the distribution switches. The end goal is to not only 
> > capture the north-south traffic on the network but also east-west 
> > traffic. It seems more efficient to just use SPANs but there are 
> > many limitations using SPANs.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
> >
> > Mitch