nanog mailing list archives

Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND


From: Tore Anderson <tore () fud no>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:42:29 +0200

* Stefan Schlesinger <sts () ono at>

On 25 Jun 2015, at 03:14, Damian Menscher via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/09/time-technology-and-leaping-seconds.html
comes dangerously close to your modest proposal.

I wonder why Google hasn't published the patch yet. Leap smear sounds
like the sane way to do leap seconds, and it would't break software
at all, because time adjustments in the sub-second area are proven to
work quite well. 

It's implemented in chronyd versions 2.0 and up, for what it's worth.
The required config directive is "leapsecmode slew".

There's a nice blog post explaining how this feature, as well as some
other approaches on how to deal with the leap second, work here:

http://developerblog.redhat.com/2015/06/01/five-different-ways-handle-leap-seconds-ntp/

Tore


Current thread: