nanog mailing list archives
Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:37:37 -0500 (CDT)
Agreed. It costs more to transport an IX to another location than the IX makes off of the port they sold you. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com> To: "Charles Gucker" <cgucker () onesc net> Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 10:49:29 AM Subject: Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix
As DE-CIX learned, NYC is a very difficult market to get connectivity and to build an exchange in. As such their operating costs are a lot higher than in other markets
circuits in the states are more painful than northern europe, japan, etc. a bunch of smaller isps in the states were annoyed at equinix's domination of the east coast markets so encouraged some european community exchanges to colonize. what they did not do was offer to subsidize any surprizes in expense, gaining a market foothold, etc. this is sometimes known as "let's you and him fight." randy
Current thread:
- DE-CIX vs Equinix Colton Conor (Jul 22)
- Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix Mark Tinka (Jul 22)
- Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix Charles Gucker (Jul 22)
- Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix Randy Bush (Jul 22)
- Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix Mike Hammett (Jul 23)
- Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix Randy Bush (Jul 22)
- Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix Mike Hammett (Jul 23)