nanog mailing list archives
Re: AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514
From: Matsuzaki Yoshinobu <maz () iij ad jp>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 18:46:26 +0900 (JST)
Colin Johnston <colinj () gt86car org uk> wrote
even if customer router crash fault, should have been filtered via prefix list blocking to only allow customer network prefixs to be anounced onwards ? as per best practice
Yes, I agree, and we have done that. How about peering partners - which is our case this time. Is it feasible to maintain strict inbound prefix filters for all peering relationships? ----- Matsuzaki Yoshinobu <maz () iij ad jp> - IIJ/AS2497 INOC-DBA: 2497*629
Current thread:
- Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Jürgen Jaritsch (Jul 16)
- Re: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Hugo Slabbert (Jul 16)
- AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Jürgen Jaritsch (Jul 16)
- Re: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Seiichi Kawamura (Jul 16)
- AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Jürgen Jaritsch (Jul 16)
- Re: AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Paul S. (Jul 16)
- Re: AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Matsuzaki Yoshinobu (Jul 17)
- Re: AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Colin Johnston (Jul 17)
- Re: AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Matsuzaki Yoshinobu (Jul 17)
- Re: AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Colin Johnston (Jul 17)
- Re: AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Matsuzaki Yoshinobu (Jul 17)
- Re: AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Wolfgang Tremmel (Jul 17)
- Re: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Jürgen Jaritsch (Jul 17)
- Re: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Jared Mauch (Jul 17)
- AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Jürgen Jaritsch (Jul 16)
- Re: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Hugo Slabbert (Jul 16)
- Re: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Hank Nussbacher (Jul 16)
- AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514 Jürgen Jaritsch (Jul 16)