Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion

[Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>]

Ricky Beam wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:20:08 -0400, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
> > > > That's the big difference - IPv6 has been designed to provide abundant
> > > > address space.
> > >
> > > There is no amount of fixed address space that can't be consumed with
> > > stupid allocation policies.
> >
> > True. However, are you making the argument that any of the current or
> > proposed allocation policies are, in fact, stupid in such a way that
> > this is likely?
>
> What seems like a great idea today becomes tomorrow's "what the f***
> were they thinking".

There will be ample evidence of what any and all of were saying. 
Thinking, maybe not.