nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48
From: "Oliver O'Boyle" <oliver.oboyle () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 20:17:13 -0400
That said this really isn't your problem. It is their problem.
Marc, Your response surprises me a bit. I wish more ISP would consider their customer's use cases more thoroughly and aim to address them as best as possible. Regional differences in expectations are reasonable and provide a good pool of use cases to examine. Agreed there are a number of ways to resolve this issue and address the use case, however. Oliver
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
-- :o@>
Current thread:
- ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Baldur Norddahl (Jul 10)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Mark Andrews (Jul 10)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Baldur Norddahl (Jul 10)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 John Curran (Jul 10)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Baldur Norddahl (Jul 11)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Mark Andrews (Jul 11)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Oliver O'Boyle (Jul 11)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Baldur Norddahl (Jul 10)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Mark Andrews (Jul 10)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 George, Wes (Jul 10)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Baldur Norddahl (Jul 11)