nanog mailing list archives

Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () mykolab com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 19:59:44 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 7/8/2015 7:49 PM, Karl Auer wrote:

On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 21:03 -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
I wasn't aware that residential users had (intentionally)
multiple layers of routing within the home.

You, we, all of us have to stop using the present to limit the
future. What IS should not be used to define what SHOULD BE.


Thank you, Karl, for that.


Unless of course we decide now that we don't WANT that. Then we
should make it hard for it to happen by applying entirely arbitrary
brakes like "/48 sounds too big to me, let's make it 1/256th of
that."


Pop history: "640k should been enough for anyone..."

http://archive.wired.com/politics/law/news/1997/01/1484

- - ferg


- -- 
Paul Ferguson
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iF4EAREIAAYFAlWd46AACgkQKJasdVTchbJlmAD+Mhv0aFvbyIN+wONv2Zyr042/
tixT8If2oJxWJ9Y7+uwBANKmA2OS7xe+IzNcQLP6tgc6/iV55Alg/FZ/azeHq/ZS
=MU5e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Current thread: