nanog mailing list archives
Re: leap second outage
From: Harlan Stenn <stenn () ntp org>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 04:47:15 +0000
Joe writes:
A leap sec causing issues. For about 40 years now, there have been these leap seconds to no real issue. All of these are "go-forwards"
No, they're all "go-backwards" events. That's no big deal to things that don't care about monotonic time, or to folks who aren't in violation of something if their timestamps are off by a second. What I'm about to say may not be as stupid as it sounds: The problems here aren't problems for cases where it's not a problem. It is a problem where it *is* a problem. It's a case where one person's signal is another person's noise. H
Current thread:
- leap second outage frnkblk (Jun 30)
- Re: leap second outage Stefan (Jun 30)
- Re: leap second outage Josh Luthman (Jun 30)
- Re: leap second outage Nicholas Suan (Jun 30)
- Re: leap second outage Joe (Jun 30)
- Re: leap second outage Harlan Stenn (Jun 30)
- Re: leap second outage Jean-Francois Mezei (Jun 30)
- Re: leap second outage Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 30)
- Re: leap second outage Harlan Stenn (Jun 30)
- Re: leap second outage Colin Johnston (Jun 30)
- Re: leap second outage Jimmy Hess (Jul 01)
- Re: leap second outage Harlan Stenn (Jul 01)
- Re: leap second outage Stefan (Jun 30)
- RE: leap second outage frnkblk (Jul 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: leap second outage Dovid Bender (Jun 30)
- Re: leap second outage Justin Paine via NANOG (Jul 01)