nanog mailing list archives

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality


From: Lamar Owen <lowen () pari edu>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:06:01 -0500

On 02/27/2015 02:14 PM, Jim Richardson wrote:
 From 47CFR§8.5b
(b) A person engaged in the provision of mobile broadband Internet
access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block
consumers from accessing lawful Web sites, subject to reasonable
network management; nor shall such person block applications that
compete with the provider's voice or video telephony services, subject
to reasonable network management.

What's a "lawful" web site?
That would likely be determined on a case-by-case basis during Commission review of a complaint, I would imagine, with each FCC document related to each case becoming part of the collection of precedent (whether said document is a NAL, NOV, or R&O would be somewhat immaterial). The obvious answer is 'a website that has no illegal content' but once something is brought to a hearing, what is 'obvious' doesn't really matter.

If you want to read about the types of rationale that can be used to determine terms like 'lawful' in this context, search through Enforcement Bureau actions relating to 47CFR§73.3999 "Enforcement of 18 U.S.C. 1464 (restrictions on the transmission of obscene and indecent material)." For more technical considerations, you might find the collection of precedent on what satisfies 47CFR§73.1300, 1350, and 1400 to be more interesting reading, if you're into this sort of arcana.



Current thread: