nanog mailing list archives

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality


From: Scott Helms <khelms () zcorum com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:04:39 -0500

AFC, the only shelf I worked on that would silently allow you to allocate
so much bandwidth to the ADSL cards that voice wouldn't work....


Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
--------------------------------
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
--------------------------------

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Jack Bates <jbates () paradoxnetworks net>
wrote:


On 2/27/2015 11:27 AM, Scott Helms wrote:

Jack,

I don't know what manufacturer you might be thinking of, but from a
standards point of view ADSL2 and ADSL2+ both have faster upstream speeds
than ADSL (G.dmt or T1.413)



Oh, standards wise, that is true. However, the gear they had (AFC)
supported 8/1.5 for ADSL and I think 24/1 for ADSL2+. My point wasn't about
standards, but an actual event. There is a perception that faster download
is an upgrade, even if your upload is reduced. For the most part, they were
right. Only a small percentage of the customers were upset at the upload
decrease.

The kicker was, the max downlink speed they allowed was 10. If they could
have supported the right annex, they could have had more upload. Vendor
limitations and such. :(


Jack




Current thread: