nanog mailing list archives
Re: [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16
From: Tim Durack <tdurack () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:00:39 -0500
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Adam Vitkovsky <Adam.Vitkovsky () gamma co uk
wrote:
Of Tim Durack Sent: 20 February 2015 14:00 IPv6 control plane this decade may yet be optimistic.And most importantly it's not actually needed it's just a whim of network operators. adam ------------------------------ This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com ------------------------------
I don't consider unique addressing of infrastructure a whim. -- Tim:>
Current thread:
- draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Tim Durack (Feb 19)
- Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Måns Nilsson (Feb 19)
- Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Phil Bedard (Feb 19)
- Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Mark Tinka (Feb 19)
- Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 George, Wes (Feb 19)
- Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Mark Tinka (Feb 20)
- Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Mark Tinka (Feb 19)
- Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Saku Ytti (Feb 20)
- Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Tim Durack (Feb 20)
- Message not available
- Re: [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Tim Durack (Feb 20)
- Message not available
- Re: [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Tim Durack (Feb 20)
- Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Tim Durack (Feb 20)
- Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Saku Ytti (Feb 20)
- Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Jeff Tantsura (Feb 20)
- Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Jeff Tantsura (Feb 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Rogers, Josh (Feb 21)
- Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 Nick Hilliard (Feb 22)