nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:43:24 +0200
On (2015-02-17 06:11 +0530), Glen Kent wrote:
I think the hardware used was Broadcom. They have a few chipsets which do MD5 and (possibly) SHA in hardware for BFD -- which i have been told is pretty much useless when you start scaling.
Thanks. I'd be more interested to see performance for Trio, EZChip and perhaps even pq3/qoriq SEC2/SEC3. Real platforms, deployed in volume today. but I guess this data, at least for Trio would be very difficult to acquire. However pq3/qoriq would, in my mind, be software implementation, as it's control-plane CPU, which means BFD would have to be punted as well. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Dave Waters (Feb 15)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Saku Ytti (Feb 15)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Glen Kent (Feb 15)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Saku Ytti (Feb 16)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Eygene Ryabinkin (Feb 16)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Glen Kent (Feb 16)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Saku Ytti (Feb 16)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Sudeep Khuraijam (Feb 20)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Glen Kent (Feb 15)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Saku Ytti (Feb 15)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Saku Ytti (Feb 16)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Dave Waters (Feb 17)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Rob Seastrom (Feb 16)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Hugo Slabbert (Feb 17)