nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 11:50:28 +0900
No, it's not an issue of A not peering with B, it's A selling "internet transit" for a known subset of the internet rather than the whole kit and kaboodle.
right. then hurricane and cogent should both make clear that they do not provide ipv6 transit to the entire internet. randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Owen DeLong (Dec 05)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric William Herrin (Dec 05)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Jared Mauch (Dec 06)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric William Herrin (Dec 06)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Owen DeLong (Dec 05)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Matthew Petach (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Matt Palmer (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Jared Mauch (Dec 03)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Randy Bush (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Matthew Petach (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Randy Bush (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Baldur Norddahl (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Paul S. (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Josh Reynolds (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Paul S. (Dec 04)
- Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric Matthew Petach (Dec 06)