nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nat
From: Matt Palmer <mpalmer () hezmatt org>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 11:23:57 +1100
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 07:30:35PM +0300, Ahmed Munaf wrote:
On Dec 17, 2015, at 8:47 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote: On 17/12/2015 17:36, Ahmed Munaf wrote:we are using ESP 20You haven't said what you mean by "better". This could mean "faster" or "copes with more sessions" or "cheaper". If your ISP is large, then it might be "cost per user is lower" or "able to cope with the number of users".I mean by better, it handle more sessions and cheaper
At what scale? You probably won't get much cheaper than an rPi and netfilter at home scale, but I wouldn't want to run a national ISP on one. Also, by "cheaper" do you just mean capex, or is opex a concern? - Matt
Current thread:
- Re: Nat, (continued)
- RE: Nat Tony Wicks (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat Ahmed Munaf (Dec 17)
- Re: Nat Nick Hilliard (Dec 17)
- Re: Nat Ahmed Munaf (Dec 18)
- Re: Nat Matt Palmer (Dec 18)