nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nat
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:59:03 -0800
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
We need to put some pain onto everyone that is IPv4 only.this is the oppress the workers so they will revolt theory.
Ah, yes, the workers are quite revolting!
load of crap. make ipv6 easier to deploy, especially in enterprise. repeat the previous sentence 42 times.
I'm still waiting for the IETF to come around to allowing feature parity between IPv4 and IPv6 when it comes to DHCP. The stance of not allowing the DHCP server to assign a default gateway to the host in IPv6 is a big stumbling point for at least one large enterprise I'm aware of. Right now, the biggest obstacle to IPv6 deployment seems to be the ivory-tower types in the IETF that want to keep it pristine, vs allowing it to work in the real world.
what keeps the cows in the pasture is the quality of the grass not the height of the fence. randy
Randy, I would happily appoint you as CIG-Q, the Chief Inspector of Grass Quality. ;) Matt
Current thread:
- Re: Nat, (continued)
- Re: Nat Matthew Petach (Dec 17)
- RE: Nat Chuck Church (Dec 17)
- Re: Nat Mark Andrews (Dec 17)
- Re: Nat Mike Hammett (Dec 19)
- Re: Nat Daniel Corbe (Dec 19)
- RE: Nat Chuck Church (Dec 20)
- RE: Nat Keith Medcalf (Dec 20)
- Re: Nat Mike Hammett (Dec 20)
- Re: Nat Randy Fischer (Dec 20)
- Re: Nat Mike Hammett (Dec 20)
- RE: Nat Keith Medcalf (Dec 20)