nanog mailing list archives

Re: PMTUD for IPv4 Multicast - How?


From: sthaug () nethelp no
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 21:49:43 +0200 (CEST)

At first, I thought this was a bug, but then learned that RFCs 1112, 1122
and 1812 all specify that ICMP unreachables not be sent in response to
multicast packets.

I'm struggling to grok the rationale behind not sending unreachables in
response to multicast packets. It seems to me that our networks put IPv4
multicast speakers in a position where it's impossible for them to do the
right thing.

For the exact same reason that replying to an ICMP Echo Request sent to
your broadcast address is generally considered a Bad Idea.

The obvious solution is "Doctor, it hurts when I do that" "Don't do that
anymore".


It's not as obvious to me as it is to you. I mean, v6 *requires* exactly
this behavior, so it can't be all that bad, can it?

ICMP replies to multicast packets can cause ICMP "implosion". This is
not a new discussion - see for instance

http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2012-June/048685.html

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no


Current thread: