nanog mailing list archives

Re: BRAS sugestion

From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:22:10 +0200



On 14/Aug/15 18:07, Clayton Zekelman wrote:


We just bought a couple of MX480s for B-RAS to replace some aging
Cisco 7206/VXRs. Not racked or powered yet (showed up yesterday), but
hope to have one of them online for testing next week.

Our initial test with an eval MX-80 verified functionality.


I like that Juniper finally dropped further development of the dedicate
BRAS code. It had become annoying.

Mark.

Current thread:

BRAS sugestion Julian Eble (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Eduardo Schoedler (Aug 14)
  - Message not available
    - Re: BRAS sugestion Clayton Zekelman (Aug 14)
    - Re: BRAS sugestion Mark Tinka (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Alastair Johnson (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Mike Lyon (Aug 14)
  - Re: BRAS sugestion Alistair Mackenzie (Aug 14)
    - Re: BRAS sugestion Peter Kristolaitis (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Mark Tinka (Aug 14)
  - Re: BRAS sugestion Dave Taht (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Baldur Norddahl (Aug 14)
  - Re: BRAS sugestion Clinton Work (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Tarko Tikan (Aug 14)
- Re: BRAS sugestion Mick O Donovan (Aug 14)

(Thread continues...)