Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions

[Nick Rose <nick.rose () enzu com>]

We have processed just under a million anomalies with this software, we use the Chelsio cards for filtering. We had 
some troubles with packet loss on the filter side until we started using those which were a new feature in the latest 
release.

If you have any questions I would be happy to answer them.

Regards,
Nick Rose | CTO 
Enzu Inc 
nick.rose () enzu com 
www.enzu.com <http://www.enzu.com/>








On 8/11/15, 2:14 AM, "NANOG on behalf of marcel.duregards () yahoo fr" <nanog-bounces () nanog org on behalf of 
marcel.duregards () yahoo fr> wrote:

> anybody from this impressive list ?:
>
> https://www.andrisoft.com/company/customers
>
> -- Marcel
>
>
>
> On 11.08.2015 03:28, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 8/10/2015 6:07 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:36:07 +1000, Nick Pratley said:
> > >
> > > > Once setup correctly. very good product - it's been running for 8
> > > > months now and hasn't had any issues. It's been very reliable.
> > >
> > > I'll bite - (roughly) how many times has it triggered and mitigated
> > > an actual DDoS during those 8 months?  We probably draw different
> > > conclusions from "8 months and 1 DDoS" reliable and "8 months of
> > > 5-a-week" reliable...
> >
> >
> > I think that would definitely depend on how the network is base-lined.
> >
> > That is sometimes more of an art than a science. :-)
> >
> > - - ferg
> >
> >
> > - --
> > Paul Ferguson
> > PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
> > Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v2
> >
> > iF4EAREIAAYFAlXJT7EACgkQKJasdVTchbJXoQD+Mhyy7gwtMkp+mdaEUiqvwlWe
> > 70mSH8n5ALmcp+qOqMoBAKo60u/ryb9IdvsclzPpoAvq+r9CtZgh+t/9YpkUIgnP
> > =d7d1
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----