nanog mailing list archives

RE: Yet Another BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) Python Implementation


From: "Peng Xiao (penxiao)" <penxiao () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 06:15:40 +0000

Hi Jeff

As our priority, we will do MPLS VPN, IPv6, Flowspec firstly. In the future, we will consider multicast and EVPN.
Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jeff.tantsura () ericsson com] 
Sent: 2015年8月7日 14:06
To: Peng Xiao (penxiao)
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu; nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Yet Another BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) Python Implementation

Hi Peng,

Good stuff!

Any plans for multicast, RTC and EVPN AF's?

Regards,
Jeff

On Aug 6, 2015, at 7:43 PM, Peng Xiao (penxiao) <penxiao () cisco com> wrote:

Hi guys,

Ipv6 and other address families are under development. We have already designed the data structures for them as you 
can see from the documentation, but it's just some testing code and not stable and we are not doing them after 
careful consideration.
But at last, they will come out.


-----Original Message-----
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu] 
Sent: 2015年8月7日 0:16
To: Peng Xiao (penxiao)
Cc: Jahangir Hossain; xxnog () ledeuns net; nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Yet Another BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) Python Implementation

On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:25:55 -0000, "Peng Xiao (penxiao)" said:
Currently, yabgp does not support IPv6 address family. We only support IPv4 now.

http://tnx.nl/legacy-ip-only.svg

Seriously guys.  It's 2015.  We really don't care what you hack for your own use - but publicly announcing stuff that 
doesn't have IPv6 support is getting kind of embarassing...

*especially* when it's a major vendor open-sourcing their code. (I'm still willing to cut a *little* slack for "two 
guys and a stack of empty pizza boxes" software....)



Current thread: