nanog mailing list archives
Re: vendor spam OTD
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 08:49:40 +0530
Given we’re going down this “what is spam” rathole again, spam is generally defined as unsolicited BULK email As the email appears to be one to one, though a remarkably persistent one to one, I would suggest procmail, unless you know he’s harvested nanog and is sending the same offer mail merged to a bunch of operators. —srs
On 28-Apr-2015, at 8:29 am, Rob Seastrom <rs () seastrom com> wrote:On 04/27/2015 07:02 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote:Anyone else been spammed by Andy Boland at "Function5 Technology Group"?I'm not sure it's fair to class the e-mail as "spam", but he is one persistent fellow. My company made list for some of the equipment we retired for purchase, and his Cisco buyer never got back to me. So the excess inventory is being offered to another reseller.Well, it's unsolicited email from a company who I've never had any commercial relationship with. If it's not fair to class it as spam, what is it fair to class it as? I reported it to the appropriate abuse folks.
Current thread:
- vendor spam OTD Rob Seastrom (Apr 27)
- Re: vendor spam OTD Stephen Satchell (Apr 27)
- Re: vendor spam OTD Rob Seastrom (Apr 27)
- Re: vendor spam OTD Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 27)
- Re: vendor spam OTD Rob Seastrom (Apr 27)
- Re: vendor spam OTD Stephen Satchell (Apr 27)
- Re: vendor spam OTD Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 27)
- Re: vendor spam OTD Barry Shein (Apr 28)
- Re: vendor spam OTD Rich Kulawiec (Apr 28)
- Re: vendor spam OTD Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 28)
- Re: vendor spam OTD Rob Seastrom (Apr 27)
- Re: vendor spam OTD Stephen Satchell (Apr 27)