nanog mailing list archives

Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality]


From: Ray Soucy <rps () maine edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:17:51 -0400

Sorry, I know I get long-winded.  That's why I don't post as much as I used
to. ;-)

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:

There's an op-ed piece in this posting, Ray. Do you want to write it, or
should I?

:-)


On April 23, 2015 10:06:42 AM EDT, Ray Soucy <rps () maine edu> wrote:

It's amazing, really.

Netflix and YouTube now overtake BitTorrent and all other file sharing
peer-to-peer traffic combined, even on academic networks, by order(s) of
magnitude.  The amount of peer-to-peer traffic is not even significant in
comparison.  It might as well be IRC from our perspective.

Internet usage habits have shifted quite a bit in the past decade.  I
think the takeaway is that if you provide content in a way that is fairly
priced and convenient to access (e.g. DRM doesn't get in your way), most
people will opt for the legal route.  Something we were trying to explain
to the MPAA and RIAA years ago when they shoved the DMCA down our throats.

I'm certainly in favor of symmetrical service.  I think there is a widely
held myth that DOS attacks will take down the Internet when everyone has
more bandwidth.  The fact is that DOS attacks are a problem regardless of
bandwidth, and throttling people isn't a solution.  The other (somewhat
insulting) argument that people will use greater upload speeds for illegal
activity is pretty bogus as well.

The limit on upload bandwidth for most people is a roadblock to a lot of
the services that people will take for granted a decade from now; cloud
backup, residential video surveillance over IP, peer-to-peer high
definition video conferencing.  And likely a lot of things that we haven't
imagined yet.

As funny as it sounds, I think Twitch (streaming video games) has been
the application that has made the younger generation care about their
upload speed more than anything else.  They now have a use case where their
limited upload is a real problem for them, and when they find out their ISP
can't provide anything good enough they get pretty upset about it.





On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>

Those are measured at the campus boundary. I don't have visibility
inside
the school's network to know who much intra-campus traffic there may
be .
but we know that peer-to-peer is a small percentage of overall Internet
traffic flows, and streaming video remains the largets.

BitTorrent makes special efforts to keep as much traffic local as
possible,
I understand; that probably isn't too helpful... except at scales like
that
on a resnet at a sizable campus.

Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink
jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think
 RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          2000 Land
Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727
647 1274




--
Ray Patrick Soucy
Network Engineer
University of Maine System

T: 207-561-3526
F: 207-561-3531

MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network
www.maineren.net


--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.




-- 
Ray Patrick Soucy
Network Engineer
University of Maine System

T: 207-561-3526
F: 207-561-3531

MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network
www.maineren.net


Current thread: