nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering and Network Cost
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:40:05 +0200
On 16/Apr/15 17:10, Edward Dore wrote:
I don't have any quantifiable data on what has happened to IP transit costs over the same period, but for a point comparison I'd say that off the top of my head you can get a 1G CDR on a 10G port from a tier-1 provider in London for approximately the same cost as a 10G port at LINX these days, maybe slightly cheaper.
Transit costs are certainly falling at a much faster rate than exchange point ports. However, because most major exchange points are pushing reasonably high ports (1Gbps and 10Gbps) to members, the challenge with filling those ports makes transit ports a more viable solution in the short term. If you're willing to stick it out long enough, peering ports can become as cheap as transit ports, but they will never give you 100% coverage like a transit port can. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Peering and Network Cost, (continued)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 21)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mark Tinka (Apr 21)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Scott Whyte (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Baldur Norddahl (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Tore Anderson (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mark Tinka (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Tore Anderson (Apr 16)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 16)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Edward Dore (Apr 16)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mark Tinka (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Justin Wilson - MTIN (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mark Tinka (Apr 16)