nanog mailing list archives
Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 22:01:16 +0100
On 09/04/2015 21:54, Christopher Morrow wrote:
the math on their page is 'interesting'...
it's a t2 chipset. should be all forwarded at asic level, i.e. at line rate per port. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch, (continued)
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch Hockett, Roy (Apr 08)
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch Furst, John-Nicholas (Apr 08)
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch Randy Carpenter (Apr 08)
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch Colton Conor (Apr 08)
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch Watson, Bob (Apr 08)
- RE: 100Gb/s TOR switch Phil Bedard (Apr 08)
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch Colton Conor (Apr 09)
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch Nick Hilliard (Apr 09)
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch Christopher Morrow (Apr 09)
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch Bryan Tong (Apr 09)
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch Nick Hilliard (Apr 09)
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch David Sinn (Apr 09)
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch Furst, John-Nicholas (Apr 08)
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch Hockett, Roy (Apr 08)
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch Randy Carpenter (Apr 08)
- RE: 100Gb/s TOR switch Klimakhin, Kirill (Apr 08)
- Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch Colton Conor (Apr 08)
- RE: 100Gb/s TOR switch Phil Bedard (Apr 08)