Re: Fixing Google geolocation screwups

[Max Tulyev <maxtul () netassist ua>]

On 04/08/15 14:56, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> That stated, properly providing a WHOIS entry for each prefix
> (inetnum/inet6num) is a good idea as that kind of indicates that that
> prefix is fixed in that location and not just moving around.

[skip]

> Do make sure though that you do not show any foreign address in the
> whois data (even if that is the correct entity that the prefix is
> registered under)

Seems that it is contrary to each other ;)

I thought to do something like automated whois query on tunnel
destination and put that (geo)data to each /48 inet6num tunnelled. But
as I don't believe it will help, so priority of that task is low and not
yet realized.