nanog mailing list archives
Re: update
From: Larry Sheldon <larrysheldon () cox net>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 01:14:23 -0500
On 9/29/2014 00:32, Pete Carah wrote:
For that matter, has the*specification* of tcp/ip been proven to be "correct" in any complete way?
I find that question in this forum really confusing.I thought all of the RFC-descriptions of protocols were taken to be statements that "if you do it this way, we think we can inter-operate" but at no time to be taken as "right" or "wrong".
-- The unique Characteristics of System Administrators: The fact that they are infallible; and, The fact that they learn from their mistakes. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
Current thread:
- Re: update, (continued)
- Re: update Barry Shein (Sep 29)
- Re: update Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 29)
- Re: update Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: update William Herrin (Sep 27)
- RE: update Keith Medcalf (Sep 28)
- Re: update Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- RE: update Keith Medcalf (Sep 28)
- Re: update Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- Re: update Pete Carah (Sep 28)
- Re: update Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 29)
- Message not available
- Re: update Larry Sheldon (Sep 28)
- Re: update George Michaelson (Sep 28)
- Re: update Merike Kaeo (Sep 29)
- Re: update Stephen Satchell (Sep 28)
- Re: update Pete Carah (Sep 29)
- Re: update Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)