nanog mailing list archives
Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience
From: George Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 00:45:50 -0700
Loma Prieta, very little; the UCSC line was a non-redundant T1 from San Jose BARRNET, and the other leaf nodes off that were down. As I recall the San Jose / SF to LA links were all golden. Phone service to Santa Cruz was down, then spotty, then up over the course of a day, but every line was jammed with people checking in so connect rates sucked. The UCSC point to point T1 had to be manually repaired I think. The telco lines had alternate routes for calls and made it work, in a bit. Northridge a few years later more or less flattened a C&W center just about at ground zero. CRL's pager-happy 24x7 MUD customer in Atlanta woke me up a minute later, and our lines through LA (and many others' lines) were down for a while. Dynamic routing was a little less dynamic then; I don't know what others did in great detail. CIX lists buzzed etc. I think that predates nanog as a list by a few months, but memory is fuzzy. George William Herbert Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 18, 2014, at 3:42 PM, "Bill Woodcock" <woody () pch net> wrote: Nothing that I recall. Sean might know better. -BillOn Oct 19, 2014, at 6:19, "Jay Ashworth" <jra () baylink com> wrote: How widespread were the effects on backbone communication circuits from those quakes?On October 18, 2014 3:22:58 PM EDT, Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net> wrote:On Oct 19, 2014, at 2:20 AM, George Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com> wrote: You should restate the "predates"; I was on console on earthquake.berkeley.edu at the time Loma Prieta let go, using among other things (then) Forumnet (now) ICB in a chat, and one of the immediate damage indications was that everyone at UC Santa Cruz dropped offline.…and I was one of those people at UCSC, who had an interesting little adventure driving home to Berkeley the next day. Also, there are probably people in Northridge and Napa who might dispute your definition of “major,” but yes,a I take your point. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Northridge_earthquake http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Baja_California_earthquake http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_South_Napa_earthquake -Bill-- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Current thread:
- Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Jay Ashworth (Oct 18)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience George Herbert (Oct 18)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Jay Ashworth (Oct 18)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Bill Woodcock (Oct 18)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Jay Ashworth (Oct 18)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Bill Woodcock (Oct 18)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience George Herbert (Oct 19)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Eliot Lear (Oct 19)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Jim Shankland (Oct 19)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Jay Ashworth (Oct 19)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Pete Carah (Oct 19)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience George Herbert (Oct 18)